linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Move soc_data to struct qcom

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221102090038.64541-4-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed,  2 Nov 2022 14:30:38 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To:     andersson@...nel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org, rafael@...nel.org
Cc:     johan@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Move soc_data to struct qcom_cpufreq

soc_data is a static info of the driver and thus no need to cache it inside
the qcom_cpufreq_data struct which is allocated per frequency domain. So,
move it inside qcom_cpufreq struct.

Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
index 6d807956aaf6..5e0598730a04 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
@@ -43,7 +43,6 @@ struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data {
 struct qcom_cpufreq_data {
 	void __iomem *base;
 	struct resource *res;
-	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data;
 
 	/*
 	 * Mutex to synchronize between de-init sequence and re-starting LMh
@@ -63,6 +62,7 @@ struct qcom_cpufreq_data {
 
 static struct {
 	struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data;
+	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data;
 } qcom_cpufreq;
 
 static unsigned long cpu_hw_rate, xo_rate;
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 					unsigned int index)
 {
 	struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
-	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data = data->soc_data;
+	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data = qcom_cpufreq.soc_data;
 	unsigned long freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
 	unsigned int i;
 
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_get(unsigned int cpu)
 		return 0;
 
 	data = policy->driver_data;
-	soc_data = data->soc_data;
+	soc_data = qcom_cpufreq.soc_data;
 
 	index = readl_relaxed(data->base + soc_data->reg_perf_state);
 	index = min(index, LUT_MAX_ENTRIES - 1);
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 						unsigned int target_freq)
 {
 	struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
-	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data = data->soc_data;
+	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data = qcom_cpufreq.soc_data;
 	unsigned int index;
 	unsigned int i;
 
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
 	unsigned long rate;
 	int ret;
 	struct qcom_cpufreq_data *drv_data = policy->driver_data;
-	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data = drv_data->soc_data;
+	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data = qcom_cpufreq.soc_data;
 
 	table = kcalloc(LUT_MAX_ENTRIES + 1, sizeof(*table), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!table)
@@ -294,10 +294,10 @@ static unsigned long qcom_lmh_get_throttle_freq(struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data)
 {
 	unsigned int lval;
 
-	if (data->soc_data->reg_current_vote)
-		lval = readl_relaxed(data->base + data->soc_data->reg_current_vote) & 0x3ff;
+	if (qcom_cpufreq.soc_data->reg_current_vote)
+		lval = readl_relaxed(data->base + qcom_cpufreq.soc_data->reg_current_vote) & 0x3ff;
 	else
-		lval = readl_relaxed(data->base + data->soc_data->reg_domain_state) & 0xff;
+		lval = readl_relaxed(data->base + qcom_cpufreq.soc_data->reg_domain_state) & 0xff;
 
 	return lval * xo_rate;
 }
@@ -371,9 +371,9 @@ static irqreturn_t qcom_lmh_dcvs_handle_irq(int irq, void *data)
 	disable_irq_nosync(c_data->throttle_irq);
 	schedule_delayed_work(&c_data->throttle_work, 0);
 
-	if (c_data->soc_data->reg_intr_clr)
+	if (qcom_cpufreq.soc_data->reg_intr_clr)
 		writel_relaxed(GT_IRQ_STATUS,
-			       c_data->base + c_data->soc_data->reg_intr_clr);
+			       c_data->base + qcom_cpufreq.soc_data->reg_intr_clr);
 
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
@@ -528,16 +528,15 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 		return ret;
 
 	index = args.args[0];
-	data->soc_data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
 	data = &qcom_cpufreq.data[index];
 
 	/* HW should be in enabled state to proceed */
-	if (!(readl_relaxed(data->base + data->soc_data->reg_enable) & 0x1)) {
+	if (!(readl_relaxed(data->base + qcom_cpufreq.soc_data->reg_enable) & 0x1)) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Domain-%d cpufreq hardware not enabled\n", index);
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
-	if (readl_relaxed(data->base + data->soc_data->reg_dcvs_ctrl) & 0x1)
+	if (readl_relaxed(data->base + qcom_cpufreq.soc_data->reg_dcvs_ctrl) & 0x1)
 		data->per_core_dcvs = true;
 
 	qcom_get_related_cpus(index, policy->cpus);
@@ -658,6 +657,8 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!qcom_cpufreq.data)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	qcom_cpufreq.soc_data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < num_domains; i++) {
 		struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data = &qcom_cpufreq.data[i];
 		struct resource *res;
-- 
2.25.1