[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <777cdf431a67056068f9c76c1a97640590854bd9.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 09:54:01 +0000
From: Elvis Wang (王军) <Elvis.Wang@...iatek.com>
To: Rex-BC Chen (陳柏辰)
<Rex-BC.Chen@...iatek.com>,
"jassisinghbrar@...il.com" <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥)
<Jason-JH.Lin@...iatek.com>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Houlong Wei (魏厚龙)
<houlong.wei@...iatek.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bingings: gce: add gce header file for mt8188
On Mon, 2022-10-31 at 03:04 +0000, Rex-BC Chen (陳柏辰) wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-10-29 at 18:50 +0800, Elvis.Wang wrote:
> > From: Elvis Wang <Elvis.Wang@...iatek.com>
> >
> > add gce header file to define the gce thread priority, gce subsys
> > id,
> > event and constant for mt8188.
> > v2 - use vendor in filename, use Dual license.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Elvis Wang <Elvis.Wang@...iatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> >
> > Thanks for the reviews, I have fixed them.
> >
>
> Hello Elvis,
>
> I think Krzysztof and I don't give you our "Reviewed-by" tag.
> This tag shows that we accept you patch but we don't accept your
> patch.
>
> You can add this tag if you see someone leave something like this:
> "Reviewed-by: Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>" and then you
> can
> add it to your patch.
>
> Please remove them.
>
> Please read this:
>
Hi Bo-Chen,
Sorry for the later reply, there is something wrong with the mail
system.
Regarding the "Reviewd-by" in the message, my previous understanding
was wrong. I understand is who reviewed it not accepted it.
Sorry for the unnecessary misunderstanding, I will delete it in the
next version, thanks.
>
>
>
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.17/process/submitting-patches.html#using-reported-by-tested-by-reviewed-by-suggested-by-and-fixes
>
> BRs,
> Bo-Chen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists