lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <044540cc-1d8b-45da-ac8b-ecc133b45dc1@amd.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Nov 2022 11:46:38 +0100
From:   Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc:     freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" 
        <linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm: Remove exclusive-fence hack

Am 01.11.22 um 22:40 schrieb Rob Clark:
> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
>
> The workaround was initially necessary due to dma_resv having only a
> single exclusive fence slot, yet whe don't necessarily know what order
> the gpu scheduler will schedule jobs.  Unfortunately this workaround
> also has the result of forcing implicit sync, even when userspace does
> not want it.
>
> However, since commit 047a1b877ed4 ("dma-buf & drm/amdgpu: remove
> dma_resv workaround") the workaround is no longer needed.  So remove
> it.  This effectively reverts commit f1b3f696a084 ("drm/msm: Don't
> break exclusive fence ordering")
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>

Oh, yes please. I had that on my todo list for after the initial patch 
had landed, but couldn't find the time to look into it once more.

There was another case with one of the other ARM drivers which could be 
cleaned up now, but I can't find it any more of hand.

Anyway this patch here is Acked-by: Christian König 
<christian.koenig@....com>.

Regards,
Christian.

> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c | 3 +--
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c
> index 5599d93ec0d2..cc48f73adadf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c
> @@ -334,8 +334,7 @@ static int submit_fence_sync(struct msm_gem_submit *submit, bool no_implicit)
>   		if (ret)
>   			return ret;
>   
> -		/* exclusive fences must be ordered */
> -		if (no_implicit && !write)
> +		if (no_implicit)
>   			continue;
>   
>   		ret = drm_sched_job_add_implicit_dependencies(&submit->base,

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ