[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y2Jgb5/U0/yt7u7o@black.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 14:19:59 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Uwe Kleine-K??nig <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] pinctrl: intel: Enable PWM optional feature
Hi Andy,
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 05:56:36PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> This is a continuation of the previously applied PWM LPSS clean up.
> Now, we would like to enable PWM optional feature that may be embedded
> into Intel pin control IPs (starting from Sky Lake platforms).
>
> I would like to route this via Intel pin control tree with issuing
> an immutable branch for both PINCTRL and PWM subsystems, but I'm
> open for other suggestions.
>
> Hans, I dared to leave your Rb tags, however the patches are slighly
> differ, because of the Uwe's suggestion on how to handle the missing
> headers. I hope you is okay with that. If not, please comment what
> must be ammended then.
>
> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Andy Shevchenko (6):
> pwm: Add a stub for devm_pwmchip_add()
> pwm: lpss: Rename MAX_PWMS --> LPSS_MAX_PWMS
> pwm: lpss: Include headers we are direct user of
> pwm: lpss: Allow other drivers to enable PWM LPSS
> pwm: lpss: Add pwm_lpss_probe() stub
> pinctrl: intel: Enumerate PWM device when community has a capabilitty
Looks good to me. For the entire series,
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists