[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221102122518.GB22857@mi-HP-ProDesk-680-G4-MT>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 20:25:18 +0800
From: qixiaoyu <qxy65535@...il.com>
To: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
Cc: qixiaoyu1 <qixiaoyu1@...omi.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: separate IPU policy for fdatasync from
F2FS_IPU_FSYNC
Hi Chao,
fdatasync do in-place-update to avoid additional node writes, but currently
it only do that with F2FS_IPU_FSYNC as:
f2fs_do_sync_file:
if (datasync || get_dirty_pages(inode) <= SM_I(sbi)->min_fsync_blocks)
set_inode_flag(inode, FI_NEED_IPU);
check_inplace_update_policy:
/* this is only set during fdatasync */
if (policy & (0x1 << F2FS_IPU_FSYNC) &&
is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_NEED_IPU))
return true;
So this patch separate in-place-update of fdatasync from F2FS_IPU_FSYNC to
apply it to all IPU policy.
BTW, we found small performance improvement with this patch on AndroBench app
using F2FS_IPU_SSR_UTIL on our product:
F2FS_IPU_FSYNC F2FS_IPU_SSR_UTIL F2FS_IPU_SSR_UTIL(with patch)
SQLite Insert(QPS) 6818.08 6327.09(-7.20%) 6757.72
SQLite Update(QPS) 6528.81 6336.57(-2.94%) 6490.77
SQLite Delete(QPS) 9724.68 9378.37(-3.56%) 9622.27
Thanks
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 11:14:55PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2022/10/21 10:31, qixiaoyu1 wrote:
> >Currently IPU policy for fdatasync is coupled with F2FS_IPU_FSYNC.
> >Fix to apply it to all IPU policy.
>
> Xiaoyu,
>
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> I didn't get the point, can you please explain more about the
> issue?
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> >Signed-off-by: qixiaoyu1 <qixiaoyu1@...omi.com>
> >---
> > fs/f2fs/data.c | 8 +++-----
> > fs/f2fs/file.c | 4 +++-
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> >index a71e818cd67b..fec8e15fe820 100644
> >--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> >+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> >@@ -2518,6 +2518,9 @@ static inline bool check_inplace_update_policy(struct inode *inode,
> > if (policy & (0x1 << F2FS_IPU_HONOR_OPU_WRITE) &&
> > is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_OPU_WRITE))
> > return false;
> >+ /* this is set by fdatasync or F2FS_IPU_FSYNC policy */
> >+ if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_NEED_IPU))
> >+ return true;
> > if (policy & (0x1 << F2FS_IPU_FORCE))
> > return true;
> > if (policy & (0x1 << F2FS_IPU_SSR) && f2fs_need_SSR(sbi))
> >@@ -2538,11 +2541,6 @@ static inline bool check_inplace_update_policy(struct inode *inode,
> > !IS_ENCRYPTED(inode))
> > return true;
> >- /* this is only set during fdatasync */
> >- if (policy & (0x1 << F2FS_IPU_FSYNC) &&
> >- is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_NEED_IPU))
> >- return true;
> >-
> > if (unlikely(fio && is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED) &&
> > !f2fs_is_checkpointed_data(sbi, fio->old_blkaddr)))
> > return true;
> >diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> >index 82cda1258227..08091550cdf2 100644
> >--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> >+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> >@@ -270,8 +270,10 @@ static int f2fs_do_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end,
> > goto go_write;
> > /* if fdatasync is triggered, let's do in-place-update */
> >- if (datasync || get_dirty_pages(inode) <= SM_I(sbi)->min_fsync_blocks)
> >+ if (datasync || (SM_I(sbi)->ipu_policy & (0x1 << F2FS_IPU_FSYNC) &&
> >+ get_dirty_pages(inode) <= SM_I(sbi)->min_fsync_blocks))
> > set_inode_flag(inode, FI_NEED_IPU);
> >+
> > ret = file_write_and_wait_range(file, start, end);
> > clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_NEED_IPU);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists