[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61725ff6-6da3-3d3c-4261-7f05c57ab9da@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 10:18:12 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>,
jack@...e.cz, paolo.valente@...aro.org
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v4 1/5] block, bfq: remove set but not used variable
in __bfq_entity_update_weight_prio
Hi,
在 2022/11/02 10:11, Jens Axboe 写道:
> On 11/1/22 8:09 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 11/1/22 8:25 PM, Yu Kuai wrote:
>>> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>>>
>>> After the patch "block, bfq: cleanup bfq_weights_tree add/remove apis"),
>>> the local variable 'bfqd' is not used anymore, thus remove it.
>>
>> Please add a Fixes tag.
>
> Looks like the rest were good to go, so I added it myself.
Thanks for helping out. I'm not sure which commit id to use since the
fixed patch is not in linux-next yet, does the commit id stay the same
when the patch applied from for-6.2 to next ?
Thanks,
Kuai
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists