[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OSAPR01MB1843224082D47CC4C1E7352BD9399@OSAPR01MB1843.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 13:37:52 +0000
From: Ondrej Valousek <ondrej.valousek.xm@...esas.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"trond.myklebust@...merspace.com" <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
"anna@...nel.org" <anna@...nel.org>,
Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] nfs: Move ACL xattr definitions to linux/xattr.h
Hi Christoph,
> Well, for that a proper formatted mail really helps.
Yeah for the first main I used Outlook to send, the second email with patch was sent directly using GIT so should be formatted well.
Sorry I am beginner here.
> And these identifiers do not belong into xattr.h. They are a non-sanctioned NFS side API, not a VFS API.
Ah yes, I forgot about VFS, true. What is the best place to keep them then?
Or is it a big issue to extend VFS with them?
I mean NFSv4 - style ACLs are IMHO even better than Posix ACLs - if not for anything else then because Posix ACLs have never been ratified - maybe we'll see them on local FS at some stage, too.
Thanks,
Ondrej
-----Original Message-----
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Sent: pondělí 31. října 2022 9:03
To: Ondrej Valousek <ondrej.valousek.xm@...esas.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org; trond.myklebust@...merspace.com; anna@...nel.org; Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] nfs: Move ACL xattr definitions to linux/xattr.h
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 07:43:58AM +0000, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
> Hi kernel maintainers,
>
> Please help to submit the following patch into kernel
Well, for that a proper formatted mail really helps.
And these identifiers do not belong into xattr.h. They are a non-sanctioned NFS side API, not a VFS API.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists