linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 24/30] arm64: cpufeature: Use kstrtobool() instead of strtobool()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 2 Nov 2022 13:46:44 +0000
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/30] arm64: cpufeature: Use kstrtobool() instead of
 strtobool()

On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 10:14:12PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> strtobool() is the same as kstrtobool().
> However, the latter is more used within the kernel.
> 
> In order to remove strtobool() and slightly simplify kstrtox.h, switch to
> the other function name.
> 
> While at it, include the corresponding header file (<linux/kstrtox.h>)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>