[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <06ef6e4b-1f42-d50f-1328-4f82fb34dd4d@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 09:55:06 -0500
From: Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@...cle.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
dyoung@...hat.com, bhe@...hat.com, vgoyal@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
hpa@...or.com, nramas@...ux.microsoft.com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
robh@...nel.org, efault@....de, rppt@...nel.org, david@...hat.com,
sourabhjain@...ux.ibm.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 7/7] x86/crash: add x86 crash hotplug support
On 11/2/22 04:26, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 10:45:00AM -0500, Eric DeVolder wrote:
>> As I'm re-reading that message, I suspect now the preference is to just to
>> strike this ifdiffery line in this file and have the code always present?
>>
>> If the preference is actually for CRASH_HOTPLUG, then let me know.
>
> Well, it is this part:
>
> "But on a plain simple laptop or workstation which has CPU hotplug,
> would it make sense for the crash ranges to get updated too when CPUs
> are offlined?
Yes, it does.
>
> If so, I think you want this code present there too, without a Kconfig
> item."
Ah, ok.
>
> IOW, if this thing doesn't make sense to have on the majority of
> machines out there - and memory hotplug machines are not the majority -
> then it should be behind a Kconfig item which is default off and gets
> enabled only when the user selects crash and memory hotplug...
>
> I'd say.
>
Ok, I'll will remove the ifdef line/pair.
Thanks!
eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists