[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <166748810082.250043.8488161005893728423.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2022 15:08:20 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Sean Nyekjaer <sean@...nix.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@...s.st.com>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: stm32: fix stm32_spi_prepare_mbr() that halves spi clk for every run
On Thu, 3 Nov 2022 09:00:42 +0100, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:
> When this driver is used with a driver that uses preallocated spi_transfer
> structs. The speed_hz is halved by every run. This results in:
>
> spi_stm32 44004000.spi: SPI transfer setup failed
> ads7846 spi0.0: SPI transfer failed: -22
>
> Example when running with DIV_ROUND_UP():
> - First run; speed_hz = 1000000, spi->clk_rate 125000000
> div 125 -> mbrdiv = 7, cur_speed = 976562
> - Second run; speed_hz = 976562
> div 128,00007 (roundup to 129) -> mbrdiv = 8, cur_speed = 488281
> - Third run; speed_hz = 488281
> div 256,000131072067109 (roundup to 257) and then -EINVAL is returned.
>
> [...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] spi: stm32: fix stm32_spi_prepare_mbr() that halves spi clk for every run
commit: 62aa1a344b0904549f6de7af958e8a1136fd5228
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
Powered by blists - more mailing lists