[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <612f7cf-43db-a684-7a98-8469275b43fd@inria.fr>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 16:58:18 +0100 (CET)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
To: Tanju Brunostar <tanjubrunostar0@...il.com>
cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, outreachy@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vt6655: change the function name
s_vFillRTSHead
On Thu, 3 Nov 2022, Tanju Brunostar wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 1:38 PM Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 3 Nov 2022, Tanjuate Brunostar wrote:
> >
> > > Remove the use of Hungarian notation, which is not used in the Linux
> > > kernel. Reported by checkpatch
> > >
> > > Fix checkpatch error related to code line ends with a '(', by joining
> > > some lines and indenting correctly. This improves visibility
> >
> > I don't think it will be appreciated to do two things at once.
> >
>
> I sent it earlier as two patches but it seemed to break and fix the
> kernel which was not appreciated by one of the mentors
OK, then it is a presentation problem. You have presented the changes as
unrelated. Rewrite the message to make clear what is being done.
julia
>
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tanjuate Brunostar <tanjubrunostar0@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c b/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c
> > > index 31ae99b3cb35..debc5d5daede 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c
> > > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
> > > * s_uGetTxRsvTime- get frame reserved time
> > > * s_vFillCTSHead- fulfill CTS ctl header
> > > * s_vFillFragParameter- Set fragment ctl parameter.
> > > - * s_vFillRTSHead- fulfill RTS ctl header
> > > + * fill_rts_header- fulfill RTS ctl header
> > > * s_vFillTxKey- fulfill tx encrypt key
> > > * s_vSWencryption- Software encrypt header
> > > * vDMA0_tx_80211- tx 802.11 frame via dma0
> > > @@ -85,15 +85,15 @@ static const unsigned short fb_opt1[2][5] = {
> > > #define DATADUR_A_F1 13
> > >
> > > /*--------------------- Static Functions --------------------------*/
> > > -static void s_vFillRTSHead(struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> > > - unsigned char byPktType,
> > > - void *pvRTS,
> > > - unsigned int cbFrameLength,
> > > - bool bNeedAck,
> > > - bool bDisCRC,
> > > - struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr,
> > > - unsigned short wCurrentRate,
> > > - unsigned char byFBOption);
> > > +static void fill_rts_header(struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> > > + unsigned char byPktType,
> > > + void *pvRTS,
> > > + unsigned int cbFrameLength,
> >
> > Strange spacing in the above parameter declaration. Maybe there is a tab
> > that should be a space?
> >
> > julia
> >
>
> I was also shocked when I noticed that. It seemed like a tab but when
> I removed the space, the two words were joined and when I added the
> space, it became this lage space once again. checkpatch does not
> complain about it though
>
> > > + bool bNeedAck,
> > > + bool bDisCRC,
> > > + struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr,
> > > + unsigned short wCurrentRate,
> > > + unsigned char byFBOption);
> > >
> > > static void s_vGenerateTxParameter(struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> > > unsigned char byPktType,
> > > @@ -555,19 +555,15 @@ s_uFillDataHead(
> > > return buf->duration;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static
> > > -void
> > > -s_vFillRTSHead(
> > > - struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> > > - unsigned char byPktType,
> > > - void *pvRTS,
> > > - unsigned int cbFrameLength,
> > > - bool bNeedAck,
> > > - bool bDisCRC,
> > > - struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr,
> > > - unsigned short wCurrentRate,
> > > - unsigned char byFBOption
> > > -)
> > > +static void fill_rts_header(struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> > > + unsigned char byPktType,
> > > + void *pvRTS,
> > > + unsigned int cbFrameLength,
> > > + bool bNeedAck,
> > > + bool bDisCRC,
> > > + struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr,
> > > + unsigned short wCurrentRate,
> > > + unsigned char byFBOption)
> > > {
> > > unsigned int uRTSFrameLen = 20;
> > >
> > > @@ -912,7 +908,7 @@ s_vGenerateTxParameter(
> > > buf->rrv_time_a = vnt_rxtx_rsvtime_le16(pDevice, byPktType, cbFrameSize, wCurrentRate, bNeedACK);
> > > buf->rrv_time_b = vnt_rxtx_rsvtime_le16(pDevice, PK_TYPE_11B, cbFrameSize, pDevice->byTopCCKBasicRate, bNeedACK);
> > >
> > > - s_vFillRTSHead(pDevice, byPktType, pvRTS, cbFrameSize, bNeedACK, bDisCRC, psEthHeader, wCurrentRate, byFBOption);
> > > + fill_rts_header(pDevice, byPktType, pvRTS, cbFrameSize, bNeedACK, bDisCRC, psEthHeader, wCurrentRate, byFBOption);
> > > } else {/* RTS_needless, PCF mode */
> > > struct vnt_rrv_time_cts *buf = pvRrvTime;
> > >
> > > @@ -931,7 +927,7 @@ s_vGenerateTxParameter(
> > > buf->rrv_time = vnt_rxtx_rsvtime_le16(pDevice, byPktType, cbFrameSize, wCurrentRate, bNeedACK);
> > >
> > > /* Fill RTS */
> > > - s_vFillRTSHead(pDevice, byPktType, pvRTS, cbFrameSize, bNeedACK, bDisCRC, psEthHeader, wCurrentRate, byFBOption);
> > > + fill_rts_header(pDevice, byPktType, pvRTS, cbFrameSize, bNeedACK, bDisCRC, psEthHeader, wCurrentRate, byFBOption);
> > > } else if (!pvRTS) {/* RTS_needless, non PCF mode */
> > > struct vnt_rrv_time_ab *buf = pvRrvTime;
> > >
> > > @@ -945,7 +941,7 @@ s_vGenerateTxParameter(
> > > buf->rrv_time = vnt_rxtx_rsvtime_le16(pDevice, PK_TYPE_11B, cbFrameSize, wCurrentRate, bNeedACK);
> > >
> > > /* Fill RTS */
> > > - s_vFillRTSHead(pDevice, byPktType, pvRTS, cbFrameSize, bNeedACK, bDisCRC, psEthHeader, wCurrentRate, byFBOption);
> > > + fill_rts_header(pDevice, byPktType, pvRTS, cbFrameSize, bNeedACK, bDisCRC, psEthHeader, wCurrentRate, byFBOption);
> > > } else { /* RTS_needless, non PCF mode */
> > > struct vnt_rrv_time_ab *buf = pvRrvTime;
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists