[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c8c7baad-e8ce-7683-933a-1d5f98f9c843@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 19:31:05 +0100
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
LUU HOAI <hoai.luu.ub@...esas.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: rcar_du: DRM_RCAR_DU optionally depends on
RCAR_MIPI_DSI
On 11/3/22 17:26, Randy Dunlap wrote:
[...]
>>
>> Randy, I think that it's more idiomatic though to it express as following:
>>
>> depends on DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI || !DRM_RCAR_MIPI_DSI
>
> I count just over 200 of each idiom (but my grep strings could be
> too crude). I guess that you want a v2 with that change?
>
I believe Kieran was happy with either so no objections from
me. I don't have a strong opinion, I just thought the latter
was more idiomatic but you said that both are used alike.
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists