| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <BYAPR21MB1688400B8CA7F1AAA4575E5DD7389@BYAPR21MB1688.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 03:30:12 +0000
From: "Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
To: Jinank Jain <jinankjain@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Jinank Jain <jinankjain@...rosoft.com>
CC: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"sthemmin@...rosoft.com" <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"jpoimboe@...nel.org" <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
"seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 3/5] hv: Add an interface to do nested hypercalls
From: Jinank Jain <jinankjain@...ux.microsoft.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 9:36 AM
>
> According to TLFS, in order to communicate to L0 hypervisor there needs
> to be an additional bit set in the control register. This communication
> is required to perform priviledged instructions which can only be
> performed by L0 hypervisor. An example of that could be setting up the
> VMBus infrastructure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jinank Jain <jinankjain@...ux.microsoft.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h | 3 ++-
> arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> include/asm-generic/hyperv-tlfs.h | 1 +
> include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h
> index 0319091e2019..fd066226f12b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h
> @@ -380,7 +380,8 @@ struct hv_nested_enlightenments_control {
> __u32 reserved:31;
> } features;
> struct {
> - __u32 reserved;
> + __u32 inter_partition_comm:1;
> + __u32 reserved:31;
> } hypercallControls;
> } __packed;
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> index 415289757428..451d8c3ab63b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> @@ -74,10 +74,16 @@ static inline u64 hv_do_hypercall(u64 control, void *input, void
> *output)
> return hv_status;
> }
>
> +/* Hypercall to the L0 hypervisor */
> +static inline u64 hv_do_nested_hypercall(u64 control, void *input, void *output)
> +{
> + return hv_do_hypercall(control | HV_HYPERCALL_NESTED, input, output);
> +}
> +
> /* Fast hypercall with 8 bytes of input and no output */
> -static inline u64 hv_do_fast_hypercall8(u16 code, u64 input1)
> +static inline u64 _hv_do_fast_hypercall8(u64 control, u16 code, u64 input1)
> {
> - u64 hv_status, control = (u64)code | HV_HYPERCALL_FAST_BIT;
> + u64 hv_status;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> {
> @@ -105,10 +111,24 @@ static inline u64 hv_do_fast_hypercall8(u16 code, u64 input1)
> return hv_status;
> }
>
> +static inline u64 hv_do_fast_hypercall8(u16 code, u64 input1)
> +{
> + u64 control = (u64)code | HV_HYPERCALL_FAST_BIT;
> +
> + return _hv_do_fast_hypercall8(control, code, input1);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u64 hv_do_fast_nested_hypercall8(u16 code, u64 input1)
> +{
> + u64 control = (u64)code | HV_HYPERCALL_FAST_BIT | HV_HYPERCALL_NESTED;
> +
> + return _hv_do_fast_hypercall8(control, code, input1);
> +}
> +
> /* Fast hypercall with 16 bytes of input */
> -static inline u64 hv_do_fast_hypercall16(u16 code, u64 input1, u64 input2)
> +static inline u64 _hv_do_fast_hypercall16(u64 control, u16 code, u64 input1, u64 input2)
> {
> - u64 hv_status, control = (u64)code | HV_HYPERCALL_FAST_BIT;
> + u64 hv_status;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> {
> @@ -139,6 +159,20 @@ static inline u64 hv_do_fast_hypercall16(u16 code, u64 input1, u64 input2)
> return hv_status;
> }
>
> +static inline u64 hv_do_fast_hypercall16(u16 code, u64 input1, u64 input2)
> +{
> + u64 control = (u64)code | HV_HYPERCALL_FAST_BIT;
> +
> + return _hv_do_fast_hypercall16(control, code, input1, input2);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u64 hv_do_fast_nested_hypercall16(u16 code, u64 input1, u64 input2)
> +{
> + u64 control = (u64)code | HV_HYPERCALL_FAST_BIT | HV_HYPERCALL_NESTED;
> +
> + return _hv_do_fast_hypercall16(control, code, input1, input2);
> +}
> +
> extern struct hv_vp_assist_page **hv_vp_assist_page;
>
> static inline struct hv_vp_assist_page *hv_get_vp_assist_page(unsigned int cpu)
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/hyperv-tlfs.h b/include/asm-generic/hyperv-tlfs.h
> index fdce7a4cfc6f..c67836dd8468 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/hyperv-tlfs.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/hyperv-tlfs.h
> @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ enum HV_GENERIC_SET_FORMAT {
> #define HV_HYPERCALL_VARHEAD_OFFSET 17
> #define HV_HYPERCALL_VARHEAD_MASK GENMASK_ULL(26, 17)
> #define HV_HYPERCALL_RSVD0_MASK GENMASK_ULL(31, 27)
> +#define HV_HYPERCALL_NESTED BIT(31)
Since it is used with a bunch of other u64 values, the above should
probably be BIT_ULL(31).
> #define HV_HYPERCALL_REP_COMP_OFFSET 32
> #define HV_HYPERCALL_REP_COMP_1 BIT_ULL(32)
> #define HV_HYPERCALL_REP_COMP_MASK GENMASK_ULL(43, 32)
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h b/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
> index bfb9eb9d7215..a2524d96ce2d 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ extern void * __percpu *hyperv_pcpu_input_arg;
> extern void * __percpu *hyperv_pcpu_output_arg;
>
> extern u64 hv_do_hypercall(u64 control, void *inputaddr, void *outputaddr);
> +extern u64 hv_do_nested_hypercall(u64 control, void *inputaddr, void *outputaddr);
Is this needed? hv_do_nested_hypercall() is implemented as a static inline
function in the x86-specific version of mshyperv.h, so this seems duplicative.
But maybe I'm missing something ....
> extern u64 hv_do_fast_hypercall8(u16 control, u64 input8);
> extern bool hv_isolation_type_snp(void);
>
> --
> 2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists