[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221103204741.GE5600@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 13:47:41 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
john.stultz@...aro.org, sboyd@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
Mark.Rutland@....com, maz@...nel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
neeraju@...eaurora.org, ak@...ux.intel.com, feng.tang@...el.com,
zhengjun.xing@...el.com, John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH clocksource 1/2] clocksource: Add comments to classify
bogus measurements
On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 10:23:25PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 11/2/22 14:40, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > An extremely busy system can delay the clocksource watchdog, so that
> > the corresponding too-long bogus-measurement error does not necessarily
> > imply an error in the system. However, a too-short bogus-measurement
> > error likely indicates a bug in hardware, firmware or software.
> >
> > Therefore, add comments clarifying these bogus-measurement pr_warn()s.
> >
> > Reported-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> > Cc: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
> > Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/time/clocksource.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> > index dcaf38c062161..3f5317faf891f 100644
> > --- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> > +++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> > @@ -443,10 +443,12 @@ static void clocksource_watchdog(struct timer_list *unused)
> > /* Check for bogus measurements. */
> > wdi = jiffies_to_nsecs(WATCHDOG_INTERVAL);
> > if (wd_nsec < (wdi >> 2)) {
> > + /* This usually indicates broken timer code or hardware. */
> > pr_warn("timekeeping watchdog on CPU%d: Watchdog clocksource '%s' advanced only %lld ns during %d-jiffy time interval, skipping watchdog check.\n", smp_processor_id(), watchdog->name, wd_nsec, WATCHDOG_INTERVAL);
> > continue;
> > }
> > if (wd_nsec > (wdi << 2)) {
> > + /* This can happen on busy systems, which can delay the watchdog. */
> > pr_warn("timekeeping watchdog on CPU%d: Watchdog clocksource '%s' advanced an excessive %lld ns during %d-jiffy time interval, probable CPU overutilization, skipping watchdog check.\n", smp_processor_id(), watchdog->name, wd_nsec, WATCHDOG_INTERVAL);
> > continue;
> > }
>
> Looks good.
>
> Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Applied, thank you!
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists