[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dee13991-49cc-2cd9-3103-121627114ca4@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 01:03:08 -0700
From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
To: "Joseph, Jithu" <jithu.joseph@...el.com>
CC: <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
<tony.luck@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>, <patches@...ts.linux.dev>,
<ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>, <thiago.macieira@...el.com>,
<athenas.jimenez.gonzalez@...el.com>, <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
<markgross@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Add current_batch sysfs
entry
On 11/1/2022 4:27 PM, Joseph, Jithu wrote:
> Each file would contain multiple tests. All these tests contained within a file would be executed when you write 1 to "runtest".
> Given this load_test too would be confusing (more appropriate than "load_test" would be "load_test_file" or "load_file" or "current_file")
>
Yeah, not sure if any of them are more suitable in that case. Maybe you
can leave it as is until someone suggests a better name or has a strong
preference for one of the above.
(Probably you can add "load_batch" to mix as well.)
Sohil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists