lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <357d9e4e-a975-7198-a496-1832d1ade3e9@suse.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Nov 2022 10:20:32 +0200
From:   Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
To:     Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Cc:     linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: fix match incorrectly in dev_args_match_device



On 3.11.22 г. 10:33 ч., Liu Shixin wrote:
> syzkaller found an assert failed:
> 
>   assertion failed: (args->devid != (u64)-1) || args->missing, in fs/btrfs/volumes.c:6921
> 
> This can be trigger when we set devid to (u64)-1) by ioctl. In this case,
> the match of devid will be skipped and the match of device may be succeed
> incorrectly.
> 
> Patch 562d7b1512f7 introduced this function which is used to match device.
> This function contaions two matching scenarios, we can distinguish them by
> checking the value of args->missing rather than check whether args->devid
> and args->uuid is default value.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+031687116258450f9853@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: 562d7b1512f7 ("btrfs: handle device lookup with btrfs_dev_lookup_args")
> Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>

> ---
>   fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 94ba46d57920..bf2d886cfb4b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -6918,18 +6918,18 @@ static bool dev_args_match_fs_devices(const struct btrfs_dev_lookup_args *args,
>   static bool dev_args_match_device(const struct btrfs_dev_lookup_args *args,
>   				  const struct btrfs_device *device)
>   {
> -	ASSERT((args->devid != (u64)-1) || args->missing);
> +	if (args->missing) {
> +		if (test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_IN_FS_METADATA, &device->dev_state) &&
> +		    !device->bdev)
> +			return true;
> +		return false;
> +	}
>   
> -	if ((args->devid != (u64)-1) && device->devid != args->devid)
> +	if (device->devid != args->devid)
>   		return false;
>   	if (args->uuid && memcmp(device->uuid, args->uuid, BTRFS_UUID_SIZE) != 0)
>   		return false;
> -	if (!args->missing)
> -		return true;
> -	if (test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_IN_FS_METADATA, &device->dev_state) &&
> -	    !device->bdev)
> -		return true;
> -	return false;
> +	return true;
>   }
>   
>   /*

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ