[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y2OjkZTOoDa+mQrS@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 12:18:41 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86/traps: avoid KMSAN bugs originating from
handle_bug()
On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 02:37:19PM +0100, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 1:51 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 12:06:11PM +0100, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> > > There is a case in exc_invalid_op handler that is executed outside the
> > > irqentry_enter()/irqentry_exit() region when an UD2 instruction is used
> > > to encode a call to __warn().
> > >
> > > In that case the `struct pt_regs` passed to the interrupt handler is
> > > never unpoisoned by KMSAN (this is normally done in irqentry_enter()),
> > > which leads to false positives inside handle_bug().
> > >
> > > Use kmsan_unpoison_entry_regs() to explicitly unpoison those registers
> > > before using them.
> >
> > As does poke_int3_handler(); does that need fixing up too? OTOH look
> > *very very* carefully at the contraints there.
>
> Fortunately poke_int3_handler() is a noinstr function, so KMSAN
> doesn't add any checks to it.
> It also does not pass regs to other instrumented functions, at least
> for now, so we're good.
Ah indeed; because it is fully noinstr, nothing will trigger the lack of
annotation.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists