linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] usb: cdnsp: Fix wrong transmission direction of EP0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y2PUBvh3z/5QPSy+@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Nov 2022 23:45:26 +0900
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Jing Leng <jleng@...arella.com>
Cc:     pawell@...ence.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] usb: cdnsp: Fix wrong transmission direction of EP0

On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 10:43:21AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 02:17:30PM +0800, Jing Leng wrote:
> > EP0 transfer is bi-directional, but in the cdnsp gadget, the
> > transmission direction of EP0 is not changed after it is
> > initialized to IN, so the OUT data from EP0 received by the host
> > is invalid.
> > 
> > The value of ep0_expect_in will change according to the value of
> > bRequestType in the SETUP transaction of control transfer, so we
> > can use it as the transmission direction of EP0.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jing Leng <jleng@...arella.com>
> > ---
> > ChangeLog v2->v3:
> > - Repair my email address.
> 
> Yes, it works, and it's validated!
> 
> Nice job, thanks.  I'll let the cdns3 maintainer review it first, but
> just wanted to say thanks for fixing this up, it makes my life a lot
> easier when accepting patches.

Oops, I missed that email footer, sorry.  That is NOT compatible with
Linux kernel development, and as per the recommendation from my legal
people, I have to go revert that change as we can't take it as-is
because it might have been sent out incorrectly as it was stated to be
"Proprietary and/or Confidential Information" which is not allowed in
the Linux kernel.

thanks,

greg k-h