[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <814737a6-384b-23ec-1f5c-ddeb08f3758e@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 09:59:39 -0500
From: Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-fsi@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rafael@...nel.org, jk@...abs.org,
joel@....id.au, alistair@...ple.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] regmap: Add FSI bus support
On 11/3/22 09:54, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 03:51:44PM -0500, Eddie James wrote:
>> Add regmap support for the FSI bus.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/base/regmap/Kconfig | 6 +-
>> drivers/base/regmap/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/base/regmap/regmap-fsi.c | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/regmap.h | 37 +++++
> I thought the plan was to put this in the MFD since that's the only
> user?
For the I2C responder regmap, yes, that's what I've done. The FSI regmap
could be used anywhere in the future. We could switch a number of
drivers to use the FSI regmap if desired, so I feel it's worth it to put
it in the regmap properly.
Thanks,
Eddie
Powered by blists - more mailing lists