Message-ID: <4a91a4cf-acac-387f-19a5-e2ce144f3496@lechnology.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Nov 2022 11:46:02 -0500
From:   David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
        Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Abel Vesa <abelvesa@...nel.org>,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc:     linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 22/65] clk: davinci: da8xx-cfgchip: Add a
 determine_rate hook

On 11/4/22 8:17 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> The Davinci DA8xxx cfgchip "clk48" clock implements a mux with a
> set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
> 
> This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
> change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
> trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
> determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
> given rate.
> 
> The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
> used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
> 
> So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
> oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
> original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
> clk_set_parent().
> 
> The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag
> CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook
> to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
> implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
> clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
> CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
> otherwise. __clk_mux_determine_rate() has the exact same behavior when
> CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT is set.
> 
> And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
> behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.

The parent is defined in the device tree and is not expected to change
at runtime, so if I am understanding the patch correctly, setting the
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag seems correct.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
> ---
>   drivers/clk/davinci/da8xx-cfgchip.c | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/davinci/da8xx-cfgchip.c b/drivers/clk/davinci/da8xx-cfgchip.c
> index c04276bc4051..4c1cc59bba53 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/davinci/da8xx-cfgchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/davinci/da8xx-cfgchip.c
> @@ -565,6 +565,7 @@ static u8 da8xx_usb1_clk48_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
>   }
>   
>   static const struct clk_ops da8xx_usb1_clk48_ops = {
> +	.determine_rate	= __clk_mux_determine_rate,
>   	.set_parent	= da8xx_usb1_clk48_set_parent,
>   	.get_parent	= da8xx_usb1_clk48_get_parent,
>   };
> @@ -589,6 +590,7 @@ da8xx_cfgchip_register_usb1_clk48(struct device *dev,
>   
>   	init.name = "usb1_clk48";
>   	init.ops = &da8xx_usb1_clk48_ops;
> +	init.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT;
>   	init.parent_names = parent_names;
>   	init.num_parents = 2;
>   
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists