[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221103195037.13ff8caf@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 19:50:37 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Andy Ren <andy.ren@...cruise.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, richardbgobert@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net, wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, petrm@...dia.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
corbet@....net, andrew@...n.ch, dsahern@...il.com,
sthemmin@...rosoft.com, idosch@...sch.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/core: Allow live renaming when an
interface is up
On Thu, 3 Nov 2022 16:58:47 -0700 Andy Ren wrote:
> @@ -1691,7 +1690,6 @@ enum netdev_priv_flags {
> IFF_FAILOVER = 1<<27,
> IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE = 1<<28,
> IFF_L3MDEV_RX_HANDLER = 1<<29,
> - IFF_LIVE_RENAME_OK = 1<<30,
As Stephen says the hole should be somehow noted.
Comment saying what it was, or just a comment saying there
is a hole that can be reused.
> IFF_TX_SKB_NO_LINEAR = BIT_ULL(31),
> IFF_CHANGE_PROTO_DOWN = BIT_ULL(32),
> };
> @@ -1726,7 +1724,6 @@ enum netdev_priv_flags {
> #define IFF_FAILOVER IFF_FAILOVER
> #define IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE
> #define IFF_L3MDEV_RX_HANDLER IFF_L3MDEV_RX_HANDLER
> -#define IFF_LIVE_RENAME_OK IFF_LIVE_RENAME_OK
> #define IFF_TX_SKB_NO_LINEAR IFF_TX_SKB_NO_LINEAR
>
> /* Specifies the type of the struct net_device::ml_priv pointer */
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 2e4f1c97b59e..a2d650ae15d7 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -1163,22 +1163,6 @@ int dev_change_name(struct net_device *dev, const char *newname)
>
> net = dev_net(dev);
>
> - /* Some auto-enslaved devices e.g. failover slaves are
> - * special, as userspace might rename the device after
> - * the interface had been brought up and running since
> - * the point kernel initiated auto-enslavement. Allow
> - * live name change even when these slave devices are
> - * up and running.
> - *
> - * Typically, users of these auto-enslaving devices
> - * don't actually care about slave name change, as
> - * they are supposed to operate on master interface
> - * directly.
> - */
> - if (dev->flags & IFF_UP &&
> - likely(!(dev->priv_flags & IFF_LIVE_RENAME_OK)))
> - return -EBUSY;
> -
Let's leave a hint for potential triage and add something extra to the
netdev_info() print a few lines down in case the interface is renamed
while UP. Perhaps:
netdev_info(dev, "renamed from %s%s\n", oldname,
dev->flags & IFF_UP ? " (while UP)" : "");
or some such.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists