linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Add several Intel server CPU mode numbers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1897905e-6e37-a13b-acc7-2ab458aadfe0@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Nov 2022 11:42:00 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Add several Intel server CPU mode numbers

On 11/3/22 13:33, Tony Luck wrote:
> These servers are all on the public versions of the roadmap. The model
> numbers for Grand Ridge, Granite Rapids, and Sierra Forest were included
> in the September 2022 edition of the Instruction Set Extensions document.
...
>  #define INTEL_FAM6_SAPPHIRERAPIDS_X	0x8F	/* Golden Cove */
>  
> +#define INTEL_FAM6_EMERALDRAPIDS_X	0xCF

Were the core names (like Golden Cove) left out intentionally?  Not a
big deal either way, but it's sometimes nice to see for things like the
hybrid parts what it might be "related" to.

Either way:

Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>