[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b2274949-8fba-24ff-89bf-627f288ace06@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 15:06:28 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>, x86@...nel.org
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86/speculation: Support Automatic IBRS
On 11/4/22 14:36, Kim Phillips wrote:
> The AMD Zen4 core supports a new feature called Automatic IBRS.
> (Indirect Branch Restricted Speculation).
>
> Enable Automatic IBRS by default if the CPU feature is present.
> It typically provides greater performance over the incumbent
> generic retpolines mitigation.
Could you also share some information on how this differs from EIBRS and
why it needs to exist in parallel to EBIRS?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists