[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221104163640.2057b74c25d6076f64912891@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 16:36:40 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: include missing
linux/moduleparam.h
On Thu, 3 Nov 2022 17:02:02 +0100 Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 42deddf3ef5c ("s390: select ARCH_WANT_HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP") is
> just a one liner activating this feature and only present in linux-next
> and s390 features branch targeting v6.2. So, if you don't want to have
>
> Fixes: 30152245c63b ("mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: replace early_param() with core_param()")
>
> fine with me. But then just dropping Fixes tag is probably a better
> option. I hope that won't prevent it from going into some v6.1-rcX.
>
> @Andrew
> should I resend? or would you be so kind to drop Fixes tag and add Reviewed-by
> without it? Thank you
I retained the
Fixes: 30152245c63b ("mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: replace early_param() with core_param()")
and added Muchun's Reviewed-by:, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists