linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: include missing linux/moduleparam.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 4 Nov 2022 16:36:40 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: include missing
 linux/moduleparam.h

On Thu, 3 Nov 2022 17:02:02 +0100 Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:

> 42deddf3ef5c ("s390: select ARCH_WANT_HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP") is
> just a one liner activating this feature and only present in linux-next
> and s390 features branch targeting v6.2. So, if you don't want to have
> 
> Fixes: 30152245c63b ("mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: replace early_param() with core_param()")
> 
> fine with me. But then just dropping Fixes tag is probably a better
> option. I hope that won't prevent it from going into some v6.1-rcX.
> 
> @Andrew
> should I resend? or would you be so kind to drop Fixes tag and add Reviewed-by
> without it? Thank you

I retained the

Fixes: 30152245c63b ("mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: replace early_param() with core_param()")

and added Muchun's Reviewed-by:, thanks.