linux-kernel - Re: [v2 PATCH 1/2] mm: khugepaged: allow page allocation fallback to eligible nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y2TOAdHk97pPYwJY@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Fri, 4 Nov 2022 09:32:01 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To:     Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
Cc:     zokeefe@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 1/2] mm: khugepaged: allow page allocation fallback to
 eligible nodes

On Thu 03-11-22 14:36:40, Yang Shi wrote:
[...]
> So use nodemask to record the nodes which have the same hit record, the
> hugepage allocation could fallback to those nodes.  And remove
> __GFP_THISNODE since it does disallow fallback.  And if nodemask is
> empty (no node is set), it means there is one single node has the most
> hist record, the nodemask approach actually behaves like __GFP_THISNODE.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+0044b22d177870ee974f@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Suggested-by: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@...gle.com>
> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
> ---
>  mm/khugepaged.c | 32 ++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> index ea0d186bc9d4..572ce7dbf4b0 100644
> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> @@ -97,8 +97,8 @@ struct collapse_control {
>  	/* Num pages scanned per node */
>  	u32 node_load[MAX_NUMNODES];
>  
> -	/* Last target selected in hpage_collapse_find_target_node() */
> -	int last_target_node;
> +	/* nodemask for allocation fallback */
> +	nodemask_t alloc_nmask;

This will eat another 1k on the stack on most configurations
(NODE_SHIFT=10). Along with 4k of node_load this is quite a lot even
on shallow call chains like madvise resp. khugepaged.  I would just
add a follow up patch which changes both node_load and alloc_nmask to
dynamically allocated objects.

Other than that LGTM. I thought we want to keep __GFP_THISNODE but after
a closer look it seems that this flag is not really compatible with
nodemask after all. node_zonelist() will simply return a trivial zone
list for a single (preferred node) so no fallback to other nodes is
possible. My bad to not realize it earlier.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs