[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y2TVXDfQUwlYFv9S@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 17:03:24 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>,
Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@....com>,
Gaurav Jain <gaurav.jain@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto/caam: Avoid GCC constprop bug warning
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 02:05:31PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static inline void append_data(u32 * const desc, const void *data, int len)
> {
> u32 *offset = desc_end(desc);
>
> - if (len) /* avoid sparse warning: memcpy with byte count of 0 */
> + if (data && len) /* avoid sparse warning: memcpy with byte count of 0 */
> memcpy(offset, data, len);
How about just killing the if clause altogether? I don't see
any sparse warnings without it. What am I missing?
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists