linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kvm/arm: Fix pvtime documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4b2b78c6-9903-1247-9d16-fc6270aa34fc@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Nov 2022 08:48:21 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc:     Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        yezengruan@...wei.com, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
        steven.price@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
        fam.zheng@...edance.com, liangma@...ngbit.com,
        punit.agrawal@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm/arm: Fix pvtime documentation

On 11/3/22 22:42, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> No, this is the correct course of action. There isn't any point in
> having an *unrelated* change in a separate series. This is a
> standalone change, posted as a standalone patch.
> 
>> Please reroll your series [2] with suggestion applied.
> 
> Or not.
> 

You mean the series before this patch have already been applied,
right?

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara