lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 04 Nov 2022 12:14:34 +0100
From:   Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>
To:     Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@...log.com>, jic23@...nel.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] MAINTAINERS: add maintainer for ADF4377 driver

On Fri, 2022-11-04 at 11:28 +0200, Antoniu Miclaus wrote:
> Add myself as maintainer for the ADF4377 driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@...log.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index e1bc31a6624b..19a2f689e43e 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -1189,6 +1189,14 @@
> W:       https://ez.analog.com/linux-software-drivers
>  F:     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/amplifiers/adi,ada4250.
> yaml
>  F:     drivers/iio/amplifiers/ada4250.c
>  
> +ANALOG DEVICES INC ADF4377 DRIVER
> +M:     Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@...log.com>
> +L:     linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
> +S:     Supported
> +W:     https://ez.analog.com/linux-software-drivers
> +F:     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/frequency/adi,adf4377.y
> aml
> +F:     drivers/iio/frequency/adf4377.c
> +
>  ANALOG DEVICES INC ADGS1408 DRIVER
>  M:     Mircea Caprioru <mircea.caprioru@...log.com>
>  S:     Supported

I think this file should be already added on patch 1 where the only
file would obviously be adi,adf4377.yaml.

I believe checkpatch should complain about this?

- Nuno Sá

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ