lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221104021035.GA297167@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
Date:   Fri, 4 Nov 2022 02:10:48 +0000
From:   HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) 
        <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
To:     James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>
CC:     Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs: don't delete error page from pagecache

On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 08:01:25PM +0000, James Houghton wrote:
> This change is very similar to the change that was made for shmem [1],
> and it solves the same problem but for HugeTLBFS instead.
> 
> Currently, when poison is found in a HugeTLB page, the page is removed
> from the page cache. That means that attempting to map or read that
> hugepage in the future will result in a new hugepage being allocated
> instead of notifying the user that the page was poisoned. As [1] states,
> this is effectively memory corruption.
> 
> The fix is to leave the page in the page cache. If the user attempts to
> use a poisoned HugeTLB page with a syscall, the syscall will fail with
> EIO, the same error code that shmem uses. For attempts to map the page,
> the thread will get a BUS_MCEERR_AR SIGBUS.
> 
> [1]: commit a76054266661 ("mm: shmem: don't truncate page if memory failure happens")
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>

I did some testing and found no issue. So I agree with this patch.
Thank you very much.

Tested-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>

As for whether to go with HGM patchset or not, I have no strong opinion.
As you stated in another email this patch is correct without HGM patch,
so it's OK to me to make this merged first.

Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ