[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5f3783a1-5e70-394d-1218-5969fb08c9c8@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 15:24:41 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
agross@...nel.org
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, marijn.suijten@...ainline.org,
kernel@...labora.com,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] soc: qcom: Add Qualcomm Ramp Controller driver
Il 04/11/22 15:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
> On 04/11/2022 10:18, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Il 04/11/22 15:04, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
>>> On 04/11/2022 09:35, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>>>> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>
>>>>
>>>> The Ramp Controller is used to program the sequence ID for pulse
>>>> swallowing, enable sequence and linking sequence IDs for the CPU
>>>> cores on some Qualcomm SoCs.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig | 9 +
>>>> drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile | 1 +
>>>> drivers/soc/qcom/ramp_controller.c | 330 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 3 files changed, 340 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/ramp_controller.c
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
>>>> index 024e420f1bb7..1e681f98bad4 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -95,6 +95,15 @@ config QCOM_QMI_HELPERS
>>>> tristate
>>>> depends on NET
>>>>
>>>> +config QCOM_RAMP_CTRL
>>>> + tristate "Qualcomm Ramp Controller driver"
>>>> + depends on ARCH_QCOM
>>>
>>> I propose:
>>> depends on ARCH_QCOM && ARM || COMPILE_TEST
>>>
>>> I don't think it is used on ARM64 SoCs, so let's make life of distros
>>> easier.
>>
>> Forgot to reply to this one: MSM8956 and MSM8976 are ARM64 SoCs :-)
>
> Yeah, indeed, I meant the other way around, so && ARM&64 :)
>
I went too fast and sent out a v2 with ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST....
....should I go for a v3?
Cheers,
Angelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists