linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 02/16] timer: Move store of next event into __next_timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri,  4 Nov 2022 15:57:23 +0100
From:   Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/16] timer: Move store of next event into __next_timer_interrupt()

Both call sides of __next_timer_interrupt() store return value directly in
base->next_expiry. Move the store into __next_timer_interrupt() and to make
purpose more clear, rename function to next_expiry_recalc().

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
v4: rename function as suggested by Frederic Weisbecker
---
 kernel/time/timer.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 717fcb9fb14a..2fd5de648d7c 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -1571,8 +1571,10 @@ static int next_pending_bucket(struct timer_base *base, unsigned offset,
 /*
  * Search the first expiring timer in the various clock levels. Caller must
  * hold base->lock.
+ *
+ * Store next expiry time in base->next_expiry.
  */
-static unsigned long __next_timer_interrupt(struct timer_base *base)
+static void next_expiry_recalc(struct timer_base *base)
 {
 	unsigned long clk, next, adj;
 	unsigned lvl, offset = 0;
@@ -1638,10 +1640,11 @@ static unsigned long __next_timer_interrupt(struct timer_base *base)
 		clk += adj;
 	}
 
+	base->next_expiry = next;
 	base->next_expiry_recalc = false;
 	base->timers_pending = !(next == base->clk + NEXT_TIMER_MAX_DELTA);
 
-	return next;
+	return;
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
@@ -1701,7 +1704,7 @@ u64 get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem)
 
 	raw_spin_lock(&base->lock);
 	if (base->next_expiry_recalc)
-		base->next_expiry = __next_timer_interrupt(base);
+		next_expiry_recalc(base);
 	nextevt = base->next_expiry;
 
 	/*
@@ -1784,7 +1787,7 @@ static inline void __run_timers(struct timer_base *base)
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(!levels && !base->next_expiry_recalc
 			     && base->timers_pending);
 		base->clk++;
-		base->next_expiry = __next_timer_interrupt(base);
+		next_expiry_recalc(base);
 
 		while (levels--)
 			expire_timers(base, heads + levels);
-- 
2.30.2