| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20220825-arm-spe-v8-7-v3-8-87682f78caac@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2022 10:55:08 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>
Cc: kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [PATCH v3 8/8] perf: arm_spe: Add support for SPEv1.2 inverted event
filtering
Arm SPEv1.2 (Arm v8.7/v9.2) adds a new feature called Inverted Event
Filter which excludes samples matching the event filter. The feature
mirrors the existing event filter in PMSEVFR_EL1 adding a new register,
PMSNEVFR_EL1, which has the same event bit assignments.
Tested-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
---
v3:
- No change
v2:
- Update for auto generated register defines
- Avoid accessing SYS_PMSNEVFR_EL1 on < v8.7
---
drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
index 82f67e941bc4..573db4211acd 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ struct arm_spe_pmu {
#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_ARCH_INST (1UL << 3)
#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_LDS (1UL << 4)
#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_ERND (1UL << 5)
+#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_INV_FILT_EVT (1UL << 6)
#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_DEV_PROBED (1UL << 63)
u64 features;
@@ -202,6 +203,10 @@ static const struct attribute_group arm_spe_pmu_cap_group = {
#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_min_latency_LO 0
#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_min_latency_HI 11
+#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_inv_event_filter_CFG config3 /* PMSNEVFR_EL1 */
+#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_inv_event_filter_LO 0
+#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_inv_event_filter_HI 63
+
/* Why does everything I do descend into this? */
#define __GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(cfg, lo, hi) \
(lo) == (hi) ? #cfg ":" #lo "\n" : #cfg ":" #lo "-" #hi
@@ -232,6 +237,7 @@ GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(branch_filter);
GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(load_filter);
GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(store_filter);
GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event_filter);
+GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(inv_event_filter);
GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(min_latency);
static struct attribute *arm_spe_pmu_formats_attr[] = {
@@ -243,12 +249,27 @@ static struct attribute *arm_spe_pmu_formats_attr[] = {
&format_attr_load_filter.attr,
&format_attr_store_filter.attr,
&format_attr_event_filter.attr,
+ &format_attr_inv_event_filter.attr,
&format_attr_min_latency.attr,
NULL,
};
+static umode_t arm_spe_pmu_format_attr_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
+ struct attribute *attr,
+ int unused)
+ {
+ struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
+ struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+ if (attr == &format_attr_inv_event_filter.attr && !(spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_INV_FILT_EVT))
+ return 0;
+
+ return attr->mode;
+}
+
static const struct attribute_group arm_spe_pmu_format_group = {
.name = "format",
+ .is_visible = arm_spe_pmu_format_attr_is_visible,
.attrs = arm_spe_pmu_formats_attr,
};
@@ -343,6 +364,9 @@ static u64 arm_spe_event_to_pmsfcr(struct perf_event *event)
if (ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, event_filter))
reg |= PMSFCR_EL1_FE;
+ if (ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, inv_event_filter))
+ reg |= PMSFCR_EL1_FnE;
+
if (ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, min_latency))
reg |= PMSFCR_EL1_FL;
@@ -355,6 +379,12 @@ static u64 arm_spe_event_to_pmsevfr(struct perf_event *event)
return ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, event_filter);
}
+static u64 arm_spe_event_to_pmsnevfr(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ struct perf_event_attr *attr = &event->attr;
+ return ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, inv_event_filter);
+}
+
static u64 arm_spe_event_to_pmslatfr(struct perf_event *event)
{
struct perf_event_attr *attr = &event->attr;
@@ -703,6 +733,9 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
if (arm_spe_event_to_pmsevfr(event) & arm_spe_pmsevfr_res0(spe_pmu->pmsver))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ if (arm_spe_event_to_pmsnevfr(event) & arm_spe_pmsevfr_res0(spe_pmu->pmsver))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
if (attr->exclude_idle)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -721,6 +754,10 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
!(spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_EVT))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ if ((FIELD_GET(PMSFCR_EL1_FnE, reg)) &&
+ !(spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_INV_FILT_EVT))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
if ((FIELD_GET(PMSFCR_EL1_FT, reg)) &&
!(spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_TYP))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -756,6 +793,11 @@ static void arm_spe_pmu_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
reg = arm_spe_event_to_pmsevfr(event);
write_sysreg_s(reg, SYS_PMSEVFR_EL1);
+ if (spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_INV_FILT_EVT) {
+ reg = arm_spe_event_to_pmsnevfr(event);
+ write_sysreg_s(reg, SYS_PMSNEVFR_EL1);
+ }
+
reg = arm_spe_event_to_pmslatfr(event);
write_sysreg_s(reg, SYS_PMSLATFR_EL1);
@@ -990,6 +1032,9 @@ static void __arm_spe_pmu_dev_probe(void *info)
if (FIELD_GET(PMSIDR_EL1_FE, reg))
spe_pmu->features |= SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_EVT;
+ if (FIELD_GET(PMSIDR_EL1_FnE, reg))
+ spe_pmu->features |= SPE_PMU_FEAT_INV_FILT_EVT;
+
if (FIELD_GET(PMSIDR_EL1_FT, reg))
spe_pmu->features |= SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_TYP;
--
b4 0.11.0-dev
Powered by blists - more mailing lists