| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2022 23:11:40 +0200
From: Michael Zaidman <michael.zaidman@...il.com>
To: jikos@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Enrik.Berkhan@...a.de,
Michael Zaidman <michael.zaidman@...il.com>,
Guillaume Champagne <champagne.guillaume.c@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/13] HID: ft260: improve i2c write performance
The patch improves the I2C write performance by 20 - 30 percent by
revising the sleep time in the ft260_hid_output_report_check_status()
in the following ways:
1. Reduce the wait time and start to poll earlier.
Sending a large amount of data at a low I2C clock rate saturates the
internal FT260 buffer and causes hiccups in status readiness, as shown
below in the log fragment. Aligning the status check wait time to the
worst case significantly reduces the write performance.
[Oct22 10:28] ft260_i2c_write: rep 0xd8 addr 0x51 off 0 len 34 d[0] 0x0
[ +0.005296] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x20, clock 100
[ +0.013460] ft260_i2c_write: rep 0xd8 addr 0x51 off 0 len 34 d[0] 0x0
[ +0.003244] ft260_hid_output_report_check_status: wait 1920 usec, len 38
[ +0.000190] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x40, clock 100
[ +0.015324] ft260_i2c_write: rep 0xd8 addr 0x51 off 0 len 34 d[0] 0x0
[ +0.003491] ft260_hid_output_report_check_status: wait 1920 usec, len 38
[ +0.000202] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x40, clock 100
[ +0.016047] ft260_i2c_write: rep 0xd8 addr 0x51 off 0 len 34 d[0] 0x0
[ +0.002768] ft260_hid_output_report_check_status: wait 1920 usec, len 38
[ +0.000150] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x40, clock 100
[ +0.011389] ft260_i2c_write: rep 0xd8 addr 0x51 off 0 len 34 d[0] 0x0
[ +0.003467] ft260_hid_output_report_check_status: wait 1920 usec, len 38
[ +0.000191] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x41, clock 100
[ +0.000172] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x41, clock 100
[ +0.000131] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x41, clock 100
[ +0.000241] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x41, clock 100
[ +0.000233] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x41, clock 100
[ +0.000190] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x41, clock 100
[ +0.000196] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x40, clock 100
[ +0.011314] ft260_i2c_write: rep 0xd8 addr 0x51 off 0 len 34 d[0] 0x0
[ +0.003334] ft260_hid_output_report_check_status: wait 1920 usec, len 38
[ +0.000227] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x41, clock 100
[ +0.000204] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x41, clock 100
[ +0.000198] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x41, clock 100
[ +0.000147] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x40, clock 100
[ +0.011060] ft260_i2c_write: rep 0xd8 addr 0x51 off 0 len 34 d[0] 0x0
Before:
$ sudo ./i2cperf -f 2 -o 2 -s 32 -r 0-0xff 13 0x51 -S
Fill block with increment via i2ctransfer by chunks
-------------------------------------------------------------------
data rate(bps) efficiency(%) data size(B) total IOs IO size(B)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
40510 80 256 8 32
After:
$ sudo ./i2cperf -f 2 -o 2 -s 32 -r 0-0xff 13 0x51 -S
Fill block with increment via i2ctransfer by chunks
-------------------------------------------------------------------
data rate(bps) efficiency(%) data size(B) total IOs IO size(B)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
52584 80 256 8 32
2. Do not sleep if the estimated I2C transfer time is below 2 ms since
the first xfer status query frequently takes around 1.5 ms, and the
following status queries take about 200us on average. So we usually
return from the routine after the first 1 - 3 status checks.
[Oct22 11:14] ft260_i2c_write: rep 0xd4 addr 0x51 off 0 len 18 d[0] 0x0
[ +0.004270] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x20, clock 100
[ +0.013889] ft260_i2c_write: rep 0xd4 addr 0x51 off 0 len 18 d[0] 0x0
[ +0.000856] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x41, clock 100
[ +0.000138] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x40, clock 100
[ +0.013352] ft260_i2c_write: rep 0xd4 addr 0x51 off 0 len 18 d[0] 0x0
[ +0.001501] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x41, clock 100
[ +0.000177] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x40, clock 100
[ +0.014477] ft260_i2c_write: rep 0xd4 addr 0x51 off 0 len 18 d[0] 0x0
[ +0.001377] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x41, clock 100
[ +0.000233] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x41, clock 100
[ +0.000191] ft260_xfer_status: bus_status 0x40, clock 100
[ +0.013197] ft260_i2c_write: rep 0xd4 addr 0x51 off 0 len 18 d[0] 0x0
Before:
$ sudo ./i2cperf -f 2 -o 2 -s 16 -r 0-0xff 13 0x51 -S
Fill block with increment via i2ctransfer by chunks
-------------------------------------------------------------------
data rate(bps) efficiency(%) data size(B) total IOs IO size(B)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
28826 73 256 16 16
After:
$ sudo ./i2cperf -f 2 -o 2 -s 16 -r 0-0xff 13 0x51 -S
Fill block with increment via i2ctransfer by chunks
-------------------------------------------------------------------
data rate(bps) efficiency(%) data size(B) total IOs IO size(B)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
45138 73 256 16 16
Signed-off-by: Michael Zaidman <michael.zaidman@...il.com>
Tested-by: Guillaume Champagne <champagne.guillaume.c@...il.com>
---
drivers/hid/hid-ft260.c | 14 +++++++++-----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-ft260.c b/drivers/hid/hid-ft260.c
index a35201d68b15..44106cadd746 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-ft260.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-ft260.c
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static int ft260_hid_output_report(struct hid_device *hdev, u8 *data,
static int ft260_hid_output_report_check_status(struct ft260_device *dev,
u8 *data, int len)
{
- int ret, usec, try = 3;
+ int ret, usec, try = 100;
struct hid_device *hdev = dev->hdev;
ret = ft260_hid_output_report(hdev, data, len);
@@ -356,10 +356,14 @@ static int ft260_hid_output_report_check_status(struct ft260_device *dev,
return ret;
}
- /* transfer time = 1 / clock(KHz) * 10 bits * bytes */
- usec = 10000 / dev->clock * len;
- usleep_range(usec, usec + 100);
- ft260_dbg("wait %d usec, len %d\n", usec, len);
+ /* transfer time = 1 / clock(KHz) * 9 bits * bytes */
+ usec = len * 9000 / dev->clock;
+ if (usec > 2000) {
+ usec -= 1500;
+ usleep_range(usec, usec + 100);
+ ft260_dbg("wait %d usec, len %d\n", usec, len);
+ }
+
do {
ret = ft260_xfer_status(dev);
if (ret != -EAGAIN)
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists