linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] i2c: core: Introduce i2c_client_get_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221106120948.0dd617b8@jic23-huawei>
Date:   Sun, 6 Nov 2022 12:09:48 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Angel Iglesias <ang.iglesiasg@...il.com>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] i2c: core: Introduce i2c_client_get_device_id
 helper

On Sat, 5 Nov 2022 22:29:29 +0100
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org> wrote:

> > I can do an immutable branch with just the new function call in it if
> > that is useful given I assume this is applicable across a bunch of subsystems?  
> 
> I'd think I should provide the immutable branch with the new I2C API
> call. Feels a bit more logical. Will that work for you as well?
> 

Absolutely. That's even better - I didn't want to assign you work to do :)

Jonathan