[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <af445171-6d54-8380-fe11-79384d145b2c@suse.cz>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2022 21:23:57 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slab_common: Restore passing "caller" for tracing
On 11/6/22 11:46, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 11:35:34PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> The "caller" argument was accidentally being ignored in a few places
>> that were recently refactored. Restore these "caller" arguments, instead
>> of _RET_IP_.
>>
>> Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
>
> Acked-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
>
>> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
>> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
>> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
>> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
>> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
>> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
>> Fixes: 11e9734bcb6a ("mm/slab_common: unify NUMA and UMA version of tracepoints")
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>
>
> BTW I think it can be just sent to next release candidate.
> The referred commit was merged in this development cycle.
Yep, dropped the Cc stable for that reason. Pushed to
slab/for-6.1-rc4/fixes and will send a PR to Linus in few days.
Thanks!
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> ---
>> mm/slab_common.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
>> index 33b1886b06eb..0e614f9e7ed7 100644
>> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
>> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
>> @@ -941,7 +941,7 @@ void *__do_kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node, unsigned long caller
>>
>> if (unlikely(size > KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE)) {
>> ret = __kmalloc_large_node(size, flags, node);
>> - trace_kmalloc(_RET_IP_, ret, size,
>> + trace_kmalloc(caller, ret, size,
>> PAGE_SIZE << get_order(size), flags, node);
>> return ret;
>> }
>> @@ -953,7 +953,7 @@ void *__do_kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node, unsigned long caller
>>
>> ret = __kmem_cache_alloc_node(s, flags, node, size, caller);
>> ret = kasan_kmalloc(s, ret, size, flags);
>> - trace_kmalloc(_RET_IP_, ret, size, s->size, flags, node);
>> + trace_kmalloc(caller, ret, size, s->size, flags, node);
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>
>
> Thanks for catching this!
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists