linux-kernel - [PATCH RFC 05/19] mm: add early FAULT_FLAG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221107161740.144456-6-david@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon,  7 Nov 2022 17:17:26 +0100
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, etnaviv@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 05/19] mm: add early FAULT_FLAG_WRITE consistency checks

Let's catch abuse of FAULT_FLAG_WRITE early, such that we don't have to
care in all other handlers and might get "surprises" if we forget to do
so.

Write faults without VM_MAYWRITE don't make any sense, and our
maybe_mkwrite() logic could have hidden such abuse for now.

Write faults without VM_WRITE on something that is not a COW mapping is
similarly broken, and e.g., do_wp_page() could end up placing an
anonymous page into a shared mapping, which would be bad.

This is a preparation for reliable R/O long-term pinning of pages in
private mappings, whereby we want to make sure that we will never break
COW in a read-only private mapping.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
---
 mm/memory.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index fe131273217a..826353da7b23 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -5159,6 +5159,14 @@ static vm_fault_t sanitize_fault_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		 */
 		if (!is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags))
 			*flags &= ~FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE;
+	} else if (*flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) {
+		/* Write faults on read-only mappings are impossible ... */
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYWRITE)))
+			return VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV;
+		/* ... and FOLL_FORCE only applies to COW mappings. */
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE) &&
+				 !is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags)))
+			return VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV;
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.38.1