linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: meter: use min() for comparison and assignment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y2kx6d9T9/1pzKk/@qemulion>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2022 21:57:21 +0530
From:   Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: meter: use min() for comparison and
 assignment

On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 06:38:35PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 07:22:24AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > In terms of run time, this patch is fine but in terms of reading the
> > > code using min() makes it less readable.
> >
> > It's not a runtime question, either should compile to the same object
> > code.  It's definitely a readabiity and standardization issue.
> >
> > In this case, IMO it'd be better to use the much more common
> >
> > 	if (ret < 0)
> > 		return ret;
> >
> > 	return 0;
>
> I also prefer this format.
>
> But at the same time, I can't advise Deepak to go around changing
> existing code where the author like ternaries.

Thank you Joe, Dan. Just to conclude, I will leave the line untouched as it is
no big advantage and the current format is more readable.

./drv

>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>