[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221107164056.557894-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 17:40:55 +0100
From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] net: lan96x: Use page_pool API
From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2022 22:11:54 +0100
> Use the page_pool API for allocation, freeing and DMA handling instead
> of dev_alloc_pages, __free_pages and dma_map_page.
>
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
> ---
> .../net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/Kconfig | 1 +
> .../ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_fdma.c | 72 ++++++++++---------
> .../ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.h | 3 +
> 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
[...]
> @@ -84,6 +62,27 @@ static void lan966x_fdma_rx_add_dcb(struct lan966x_rx *rx,
> rx->last_entry = dcb;
> }
>
> +static int lan966x_fdma_rx_alloc_page_pool(struct lan966x_rx *rx)
> +{
> + struct lan966x *lan966x = rx->lan966x;
> + struct page_pool_params pp_params = {
> + .order = rx->page_order,
> + .flags = PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP | PP_FLAG_DMA_SYNC_DEV,
> + .pool_size = FDMA_DCB_MAX,
> + .nid = NUMA_NO_NODE,
> + .dev = lan966x->dev,
> + .dma_dir = DMA_FROM_DEVICE,
> + .offset = 0,
> + .max_len = PAGE_SIZE << rx->page_order,
::max_len's primary purpose is to save time on DMA syncs.
First of all, you can substract
`SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info))`, your HW never
writes to those last couple hundred bytes.
But I suggest calculating ::max_len basing on your current MTU
value. Let's say you have 16k pages and MTU of 1500, that is a huge
difference (except your DMA is always coherent, but I assume that's
not the case).
In lan966x_fdma_change_mtu() you do:
max_mtu = lan966x_fdma_get_max_mtu(lan966x);
max_mtu += IFH_LEN_BYTES;
max_mtu += SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
max_mtu += VLAN_HLEN * 2;
`lan966x_fdma_get_max_mtu(lan966x) + IFH_LEN_BYTES + VLAN_HLEN * 2`
(ie 1536 for the MTU of 1500) is your max_len value actually, given
that you don't reserve any headroom (which is unfortunate, but I
guess you're working on this already, since XDP requires
%XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM).
> + };
> +
> + rx->page_pool = page_pool_create(&pp_params);
> + if (IS_ERR(rx->page_pool))
> + return PTR_ERR(rx->page_pool);
> +
> + return 0;
return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(rx->page_pool);
> +}
> +
> static int lan966x_fdma_rx_alloc(struct lan966x_rx *rx)
> {
> struct lan966x *lan966x = rx->lan966x;
[...]
> --
> 2.38.0
Thanks,
Olek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists