[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k0463axq.fsf@stealth>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 17:56:49 +0000
From: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@...edance.com>
To: Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
yezengruan@...wei.com, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
maz@...nel.org, steven.price@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
bagasdotme@...il.com, fam.zheng@...edance.com,
liangma@...ngbit.com, punit.agrawal@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [v2 1/6] KVM: arm64: Document PV-lock interface
Hi Usama,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com> writes:
> Introduce a paravirtualization interface for KVM/arm64 to obtain whether
> the VCPU is currently running or not.
>
> The PV lock structure of the guest is allocated by user space.
>
> A hypercall interface is provided for the guest to interrogate the
> location of the shared memory structures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zengruan Ye <yezengruan@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com>
> ---
> Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst | 1 +
> Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.rst | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Documentation/virt/kvm/devices/vcpu.rst | 25 ++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 78 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.rst
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst
> index e84848432158..b8499dc00a6a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst
> @@ -10,4 +10,5 @@ ARM
> hyp-abi
> hypercalls
> pvtime
> + pvlock
> ptp_kvm
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d3c391b16d36
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +Paravirtualized lock support for arm64
> +======================================
> +
> +KVM/arm64 provides a hypervisor service call for paravirtualized guests to
> +determine whether a VCPU is currently running or not.
> +
> +A new SMCCC compatible hypercall is defined:
> +
> +* ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_PV_LOCK_FUNC_ID: 0xC6000002
> +
> +ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_PV_LOCK_FUNC_ID
> +
> + ============= ======== ==========================================
> + Function ID: (uint32) 0xC6000002
> + Return value: (int64) IPA of the pv lock data structure for this
> + VCPU. On failure:
> + NOT_SUPPORTED (-1)
> + ============= ======== ==========================================
> +
> +The IPA returned by PV_LOCK_PREEMPTED should be mapped by the guest as normal
> +memory with inner and outer write back caching attributes, in the inner
> +shareable domain.
> +
> +PV_LOCK_PREEMPTED returns the structure for the calling VCPU.
> +
> +PV lock state
> +-------------
> +
> +The structure pointed to by the PV_LOCK_PREEMPTED hypercall is as follows:
> +
> ++-----------+-------------+-------------+---------------------------------+
> +| Field | Byte Length | Byte Offset | Description |
> ++===========+=============+=============+=================================+
> +| preempted | 8 | 0 | Indicate if the VCPU that owns |
> +| | | | this struct is running or not. |
> +| | | | Non-zero values mean the VCPU |
> +| | | | has been preempted. Zero means |
> +| | | | the VCPU is not preempted. |
> ++-----------+-------------+-------------+---------------------------------+
> +
> +The preempted field will be updated to 1 by the hypervisor prior to scheduling
> +a VCPU. When the VCPU is scheduled out, the preempted field will be updated
> +to 0 by the hypervisor.
The text above doesn't match the description in the table. Please update
the texts to align them with the code.
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists