[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8560651c-d234-65d0-557d-523d05a45c9b@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 10:08:55 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@...roma2.it>
Cc: Stefano Salsano <stefano.salsano@...roma2.it>,
Paolo Lungaroni <paolo.lungaroni@...roma2.it>,
Ahmed Abdelsalam <ahabdels.dev@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Daniel Müller <deso@...teo.net>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net] seg6: selftests/bpf: fix BPF object file name in
test_lwt_seg6local.sh
On 11/7/22 6:30 AM, Andrea Mayer wrote:
> The test_lwt_seg6local.c implements several eBPF programs which are
> used to test the SRv6 End.BPF behavior.
> Since commit afef88e65554 ("selftests/bpf: Store BPF object files with
> .bpf.o extension"), part of the build system and test programs loading
> BPF object files are supposed to work with the .bpf.o extension.
>
> Consequently, the test_lwt_seg6local.c is compiled into
> test_lwt_seg6local.bpf.o and the corresponding test_lwt_seg6local.sh
> script is not updated to deal with the correct .bpf.o extension.
>
> This patch fixes the test_lwt_seg6local.sh, using the correct .bpf.o
> extension for the testing BPF object file, i.e. test_lwt_seg6local.bpf.o.
This has already been fixed in
commit 98af3746026c ("selftests/bpf: fix missing BPF object files") in bpf-next.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists