linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: examples: add a list of templates and solutions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c8ad788b-5934-8dee-e122-3450a19dd08f@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2022 19:35:38 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: examples: add a list of templates and
 solutions

On 04/11/2022 22:47, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>> +7. Phandle to syscon with offset:
>>>> +   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/samsung/exynos-usi.yaml
>>>> +   Line: 42
>>>> +
>>>> +8. Variable length of array (e.g. clocks and clock-names) but narrowed to
>>>> +   specific variant:
>>>> +   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,mmcc.yaml
>>>> +   Lines: 33 and 71
>>>
>>> It seems like some of these that are just a single property we could add 
>>> to example-schema.yaml.
>>
>> I am afraid the example-schema will grow too big for folks to look into.
>> It's already quite complicated, with explanations of the dtschema
>> behavior itself.
> 
> How about splitting up the top-level descriptions and property examples?

You mean splitting up to separate YAML files? I guess this could work
and still be concise - few examples showing different concepts.

> 
>> How about then RST file with small code snippets?
> 
> Then they don't validate.
> 
>>
>>> Also, perhaps a reference to this from writing-schema.rst.
>>
>> I can do this as well.
>>
>> The problem with my approach above (and adding these to writing-schema)
>> is that examples above can change, lines can be inadequate.
> 
> I just meant a link in writing-schema.rst to this doc. We already have 
> that for example-schema.yaml.


Best regards,
Krzysztof