linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs: don't delete error page from pagecache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHbLzkpb5+sPmKLNjoL27mNoVFiKnNCwU6JJY_R7VquJL7VG5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2022 10:50:35 -0800
From:   Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
To:     HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) 
        <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
Cc:     Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs: don't delete error page from pagecache

On Sun, Nov 6, 2022 at 8:25 PM HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口　直也)
<naoya.horiguchi@....com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 06:27:44AM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> > On 11/04/22 02:10, HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 08:01:25PM +0000, James Houghton wrote:
> > > > This change is very similar to the change that was made for shmem [1],
> > > > and it solves the same problem but for HugeTLBFS instead.
> > > >
> > > > Currently, when poison is found in a HugeTLB page, the page is removed
> > > > from the page cache. That means that attempting to map or read that
> > > > hugepage in the future will result in a new hugepage being allocated
> > > > instead of notifying the user that the page was poisoned. As [1] states,
> > > > this is effectively memory corruption.
> > > >
> > > > The fix is to leave the page in the page cache. If the user attempts to
> > > > use a poisoned HugeTLB page with a syscall, the syscall will fail with
> > > > EIO, the same error code that shmem uses. For attempts to map the page,
> > > > the thread will get a BUS_MCEERR_AR SIGBUS.
> > > >
> > > > [1]: commit a76054266661 ("mm: shmem: don't truncate page if memory failure happens")
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>
> > >
> > > I did some testing and found no issue. So I agree with this patch.
> > > Thank you very much.
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
> > >
> > > As for whether to go with HGM patchset or not, I have no strong opinion.
> > > As you stated in another email this patch is correct without HGM patch,
> > > so it's OK to me to make this merged first.
> >
> > Thanks Naoya.
> >
> > This is a late thought, but ...
> > Should this patch and Yang Shi's shmem patch be backported to stable releases?
> > Both address potential data corruption/loss, so it certainly seems like
> > stable material.
>
> Yes, I agree that backporting these could be helpful.

+1

>
> So I think that I'll try to backport commit a7605426666 and its dependencies
> to 5.15 (and older LTS if possible).  For this patch, just adding "Cc: stable"
> should be enough for now.

Thanks, Naoya.

>
> Thanks,
> Naoya Horiguchi