linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 05/19] mm: add early FAULT_FLAG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6589BFC5-9DF4-4757-9B32-483294E03CAE@vmware.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2022 19:50:05 +0000
From:   Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
CC:     kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "etnaviv@...ts.freedesktop.org" <etnaviv@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 05/19] mm: add early FAULT_FLAG_WRITE consistency
 checks

On Nov 7, 2022, at 11:27 AM, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:

> !! External Email
> 
> On 07.11.22 20:03, Nadav Amit wrote:
>> On Nov 7, 2022, at 8:17 AM, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> !! External Email
>>> 
>>> Let's catch abuse of FAULT_FLAG_WRITE early, such that we don't have to
>>> care in all other handlers and might get "surprises" if we forget to do
>>> so.
>>> 
>>> Write faults without VM_MAYWRITE don't make any sense, and our
>>> maybe_mkwrite() logic could have hidden such abuse for now.
>>> 
>>> Write faults without VM_WRITE on something that is not a COW mapping is
>>> similarly broken, and e.g., do_wp_page() could end up placing an
>>> anonymous page into a shared mapping, which would be bad.
>>> 
>>> This is a preparation for reliable R/O long-term pinning of pages in
>>> private mappings, whereby we want to make sure that we will never break
>>> COW in a read-only private mapping.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>>> ---
>>> mm/memory.c | 8 ++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
>>> index fe131273217a..826353da7b23 100644
>>> --- a/mm/memory.c
>>> +++ b/mm/memory.c
>>> @@ -5159,6 +5159,14 @@ static vm_fault_t sanitize_fault_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>                 */
>>>                if (!is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags))
>>>                        *flags &= ~FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE;
>>> +       } else if (*flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) {
>>> +               /* Write faults on read-only mappings are impossible ... */
>>> +               if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYWRITE)))
>>> +                       return VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV;
>>> +               /* ... and FOLL_FORCE only applies to COW mappings. */
>>> +               if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE) &&
>>> +                                !is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags)))
>>> +                       return VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV;
>> 
>> Not sure about the WARN_*(). Seems as if it might trigger in benign even if
>> rare scenarios, e.g., mprotect() racing with page-fault.
> 
> We most certainly would want to catch any such broken/racy cases. There
> are no benign cases I could possibly think of.
> 
> Page faults need the mmap lock in read. mprotect() / VMA changes need
> the mmap lock in write. Whoever calls handle_mm_fault() is supposed to
> properly check VMA permissions.

My bad. I now see it. Thanks for explaining.