lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 21:01:50 +0100 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org Cc: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> Subject: [PATCH v1 4/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Rename ACPI-related functions From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com> The names of rtc_wake_setup() and cmos_wake_setup() don't indicate that these functions are ACPI-related, which is the case, and the former doesn't really reflect the role of the function. Rename them to acpi_rtc_event_setup() and cmos_acpi_wake_setup(), respectively, to address this shortcoming. No intentional functional impact. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com> --- drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) Index: linux-pm/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c @@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ static u32 rtc_handler(void *context) return ACPI_INTERRUPT_HANDLED; } -static void rtc_wake_setup(struct device *dev) +static void acpi_rtc_event_setup(struct device *dev) { if (acpi_disabled) return; @@ -828,7 +828,7 @@ static void use_acpi_alarm_quirks(void) static inline void use_acpi_alarm_quirks(void) { } #endif -static void cmos_wake_setup(struct device *dev) +static void cmos_acpi_wake_setup(struct device *dev) { if (acpi_disabled) return; @@ -880,11 +880,11 @@ static void cmos_check_acpi_rtc_status(s #else /* !CONFIG_ACPI */ -static inline void rtc_wake_setup(struct device *dev) +static inline void acpi_rtc_event_setup(struct device *dev) { } -static inline void cmos_wake_setup(struct device *dev) +static inline void cmos_acpi_wake_setup(struct device *dev) { } @@ -986,7 +986,7 @@ cmos_do_probe(struct device *dev, struct cmos_rtc.wake_off = info->wake_off; } } else { - cmos_wake_setup(dev); + cmos_acpi_wake_setup(dev); } if (cmos_rtc.day_alrm >= 128) @@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@ cmos_do_probe(struct device *dev, struct * the ACPI RTC fixed event. */ if (!info) - rtc_wake_setup(dev); + acpi_rtc_event_setup(dev); dev_info(dev, "%s%s, %d bytes nvram%s\n", !is_valid_irq(rtc_irq) ? "no alarms" :
Powered by blists - more mailing lists