linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 08/11] of: property: Add device link support for PCS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221107202223.ihdk4ubbqpro5w5y@skbuf>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2022 22:22:23 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
        Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 08/11] of: property: Add device link support
 for PCS

On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 02:10:10PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 05:06:47PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> > This adds device link support for PCS devices. Both the recommended
> > pcs-handle and the deprecated pcsphy-handle properties are supported.
> > This should provide better probe ordering.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > (no changes since v1)
> > 
> >  drivers/of/property.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> Seems like no dependency on the rest of the series, so I can take this 
> patch?

Is fw_devlink well-behaved these days, so as to not break (forever defer)
the probing of the device having the pcs-handle, if no driver probed on
the referenced PCS? Because the latter is what will happen if no one
picks up Sean's patches to probe PCS devices in the usual device model
way, I think.