linux-kernel - [PATCH v6 11/24] dmaengine: dw-edma: Stop checking debugfs_create

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221107210438.1515-12-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2022 00:04:25 +0300
From:   Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
To:     Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Cai Huoqing <cai.huoqing@...ux.dev>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
CC:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        caihuoqing <caihuoqing@...du.com>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v6 11/24] dmaengine: dw-edma: Stop checking debugfs_create_*() return value

First of all they never return NULL. So checking their return value for
being not NULL just pointless. Secondly the DebugFS subsystem is designed
in a way to be used as simple as possible. So if one of the
debugfs_create_*() method in a hierarchy fails, the following methods will
just silently return the passed erroneous parental dentry. Finally the
code is supposed to be working no matter whether anything DebugFS-related
fails. So in order to make code simpler and DebugFS-independent let's drop
the debugfs_create_*() methods return value checking in the same way as
the most of the kernel drivers do.

Note in order to preserve some memory space we suggest to skip the DebugFS
nodes initialization if the file system in unavailable.

Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c | 20 +++++---------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c
index 8e61810dea4b..6e7f3ef60ca7 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c
@@ -100,9 +100,8 @@ static void dw_edma_debugfs_create_x32(const struct debugfs_entries entries[],
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < nr_entries; i++) {
-		if (!debugfs_create_file_unsafe(entries[i].name, 0444, dir,
-						entries[i].reg,	&fops_x32))
-			break;
+		debugfs_create_file_unsafe(entries[i].name, 0444, dir,
+					   entries[i].reg, &fops_x32);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -168,8 +167,6 @@ static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs_wr(struct dentry *dir)
 	char name[16];
 
 	regs_dir = debugfs_create_dir(WRITE_STR, dir);
-	if (!regs_dir)
-		return;
 
 	nr_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(debugfs_regs);
 	dw_edma_debugfs_create_x32(debugfs_regs, nr_entries, regs_dir);
@@ -184,8 +181,6 @@ static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs_wr(struct dentry *dir)
 		snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s:%d", CHANNEL_STR, i);
 
 		ch_dir = debugfs_create_dir(name, regs_dir);
-		if (!ch_dir)
-			return;
 
 		dw_edma_debugfs_regs_ch(&regs->type.unroll.ch[i].wr, ch_dir);
 
@@ -237,8 +232,6 @@ static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs_rd(struct dentry *dir)
 	char name[16];
 
 	regs_dir = debugfs_create_dir(READ_STR, dir);
-	if (!regs_dir)
-		return;
 
 	nr_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(debugfs_regs);
 	dw_edma_debugfs_create_x32(debugfs_regs, nr_entries, regs_dir);
@@ -253,8 +246,6 @@ static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs_rd(struct dentry *dir)
 		snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s:%d", CHANNEL_STR, i);
 
 		ch_dir = debugfs_create_dir(name, regs_dir);
-		if (!ch_dir)
-			return;
 
 		dw_edma_debugfs_regs_ch(&regs->type.unroll.ch[i].rd, ch_dir);
 
@@ -273,8 +264,6 @@ static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs(void)
 	int nr_entries;
 
 	regs_dir = debugfs_create_dir(REGISTERS_STR, dw->debugfs);
-	if (!regs_dir)
-		return;
 
 	nr_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(debugfs_regs);
 	dw_edma_debugfs_create_x32(debugfs_regs, nr_entries, regs_dir);
@@ -285,6 +274,9 @@ static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs(void)
 
 void dw_edma_v0_debugfs_on(struct dw_edma *_dw)
 {
+	if (!debugfs_initialized())
+		return;
+
 	dw = _dw;
 	if (!dw)
 		return;
@@ -294,8 +286,6 @@ void dw_edma_v0_debugfs_on(struct dw_edma *_dw)
 		return;
 
 	dw->debugfs = debugfs_create_dir(dw->name, NULL);
-	if (!dw->debugfs)
-		return;
 
 	debugfs_create_u32("mf", 0444, dw->debugfs, &dw->chip->mf);
 	debugfs_create_u16("wr_ch_cnt", 0444, dw->debugfs, &dw->wr_ch_cnt);
-- 
2.38.0