[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y2l21CkXvm7mkONq@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 23:21:24 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Rename ACPI-related functions
On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 09:01:50PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> The names of rtc_wake_setup() and cmos_wake_setup() don't indicate
> that these functions are ACPI-related, which is the case, and the
> former doesn't really reflect the role of the function.
>
> Rename them to acpi_rtc_event_setup() and cmos_acpi_wake_setup(),
> respectively, to address this shortcoming.
Hmm... I'm not sure I understand why in one case acpi is a prefix and
in the other is kinda mid-suffix?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists