Message-ID: <497c057d-4e7d-0dcb-fd4c-2c7ef6efb573@yadro.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2022 00:40:19 +0300
From:   Evgenii Shatokhin <e.shatokhin@...ro.com>
To:     Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
CC:     Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>,
        "Anup Patel" <anup@...infault.org>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
        "Nick Kossifidis" <mick@....forth.gr>,
        <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Valentina Fernandez <valentina.fernandezalanis@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] riscv: fix reserved memory setup

Hi,

On 07.11.2022 18:15, Conor Dooley wrote:
> «Внимание! Данное письмо от внешнего адресата!»
> 
> Currently, RISC-V sets up reserved memory using the "early" copy of the
> device tree. As a result, when trying to get a reserved memory region
> using of_reserved_mem_lookup(), the pointer to reserved memory regions
> is using the early, pre-virtual-memory address which causes a kernel
> panic when trying to use the buffer's name:
> 
>   Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00000000401c31ac
>   Oops [#1]
>   Modules linked in:
>   CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.0.0-rc1-00001-g0d9d6953d834 #1
>   Hardware name: Microchip PolarFire-SoC Icicle Kit (DT)
>   epc : string+0x4a/0xea
>    ra : vsnprintf+0x1e4/0x336
>   epc : ffffffff80335ea0 ra : ffffffff80338936 sp : ffffffff81203be0
>    gp : ffffffff812e0a98 tp : ffffffff8120de40 t0 : 0000000000000000
>    t1 : ffffffff81203e28 t2 : 7265736572203a46 s0 : ffffffff81203c20
>    s1 : ffffffff81203e28 a0 : ffffffff81203d22 a1 : 0000000000000000
>    a2 : ffffffff81203d08 a3 : 0000000081203d21 a4 : ffffffffffffffff
>    a5 : 00000000401c31ac a6 : ffff0a00ffffff04 a7 : ffffffffffffffff
>    s2 : ffffffff81203d08 s3 : ffffffff81203d00 s4 : 0000000000000008
>    s5 : ffffffff000000ff s6 : 0000000000ffffff s7 : 00000000ffffff00
>    s8 : ffffffff80d9821a s9 : ffffffff81203d22 s10: 0000000000000002
>    s11: ffffffff80d9821c t3 : ffffffff812f3617 t4 : ffffffff812f3617
>    t5 : ffffffff812f3618 t6 : ffffffff81203d08
>   status: 0000000200000100 badaddr: 00000000401c31ac cause: 000000000000000d
>   [<ffffffff80338936>] vsnprintf+0x1e4/0x336
>   [<ffffffff80055ae2>] vprintk_store+0xf6/0x344
>   [<ffffffff80055d86>] vprintk_emit+0x56/0x192
>   [<ffffffff80055ed8>] vprintk_default+0x16/0x1e
>   [<ffffffff800563d2>] vprintk+0x72/0x80
>   [<ffffffff806813b2>] _printk+0x36/0x50
>   [<ffffffff8068af48>] print_reserved_mem+0x1c/0x24
>   [<ffffffff808057ec>] paging_init+0x528/0x5bc
>   [<ffffffff808031ae>] setup_arch+0xd0/0x592
>   [<ffffffff8080070e>] start_kernel+0x82/0x73c
> 
> early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem() takes no arguments as it operates on
> initial_boot_params, which is populated by early_init_dt_verify(). On
> RISC-V, early_init_dt_verify() is called twice. Once, directly, in
> setup_arch() if CONFIG_BUILTIN_DTB is not enabled and once indirectly,
> very early in the boot process, by parse_dtb() when it calls
> early_init_dt_scan_nodes().
> 
> This first call uses dtb_early_va to set initial_boot_params, which is
> not usable later in the boot process when
> early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem() is called. On arm64 for example, the
> corresponding call to early_init_dt_scan_nodes() uses fixmap addresses
> and doesn't suffer the same fate.

Thank you for looking into this!

As I wrote earlier, I ran into this issue too, while working on a 
remoteproc driver for our RISC-V-based SoC.

The proposed patch fixes the bug for me and seems to have no problematic 
side-effects. So:

Tested-by: Evgenii Shatokhin <e.shatokhin@...ro.com>

> 
> Move early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem() further along the boot sequence,
> after the direct call to early_init_dt_verify() in setup_arch() so that
> the names use the correct virtual memory addresses. The above supposed
> that CONFIG_BUILTIN_DTB was not set, but should work equally in the case
> where it is - unflatted_and_copy_device_tree() also updates
> initial_boot_params.
> 
> Reported-by: Valentina Fernandez <valentina.fernandezalanis@...rochip.com>
> Reported-by: Evgenii Shatokhin <e.shatokhin@...ro.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/f8e67f82-103d-156c-deb0-d6d6e2756f5e@microchip.com/
> Fixes: 922b0375fc93 ("riscv: Fix memblock reservation for device tree blob")
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> ---
>   arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 1 +
>   arch/riscv/mm/init.c      | 1 -
>   2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> index ad76bb59b059..67ec1fadcfe2 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>          else
>                  pr_err("No DTB found in kernel mappings\n");
>   #endif
> +       early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem();
>          misc_mem_init();
> 
>          init_resources();
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> index b56a0a75533f..50a1b6edd491 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> @@ -262,7 +262,6 @@ static void __init setup_bootmem(void)
>                          memblock_reserve(dtb_early_pa, fdt_totalsize(dtb_early_va));
>          }
> 
> -       early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem();
>          dma_contiguous_reserve(dma32_phys_limit);
>          if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT))
>                  hugetlb_cma_reserve(PUD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT);
> --
> 2.38.0
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists