[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221107180022-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 18:06:02 -0500
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
Cc: eric.auger.pro@...il.com, jasowang@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterx@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] vhost: Clear the pending messages on
vhost_init_device_iotlb()
On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 10:10:06PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> On 11/7/22 21:42, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 09:34:31PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
> >> When the vhost iotlb is used along with a guest virtual iommu
> >> and the guest gets rebooted, some MISS messages may have been
> >> recorded just before the reboot and spuriously executed by
> >> the virtual iommu after the reboot. Despite the device iotlb gets
> >> re-initialized, the messages are not cleared. Fix that by calling
> >> vhost_clear_msg() at the end of vhost_init_device_iotlb().
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 1 +
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> >> index 40097826cff0..422a1fdee0ca 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> >> @@ -1751,6 +1751,7 @@ int vhost_init_device_iotlb(struct vhost_dev *d, bool enabled)
> >> }
> >>
> >> vhost_iotlb_free(oiotlb);
> >> + vhost_clear_msg(d);
> >>
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> > Hmm. Can't messages meanwhile get processes and affect the
> > new iotlb?
> Isn't the msg processing stopped at the moment this function is called
> (VHOST_SET_FEATURES)?
>
> Thanks
>
> Eric
It's pretty late here I'm not sure. You tell me what prevents it.
BTW vhost_init_device_iotlb gets enabled parameter but ignores
it, we really should drop that.
Also, it looks like if features are set with VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM
and then cleared, iotlb is not properly cleared - bug?
> >
> >
> >> --
> >> 2.37.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists