[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5af2329-7cc5-9909-b630-70fb102229fd@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 15:20:17 -0800
From: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
CC: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] dt-bindings: qcom,pdc: Introduce pdc bindings for
QDU1000 and QRU1000
On 11/7/2022 9:16 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 02:31:08PM -0700, Melody Olvera wrote:
>>
>> On 10/27/2022 11:22 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Quoting Melody Olvera (2022-10-26 12:04:41)
>>>> Add compatible fields for QDU1000 and QRU1000 pdcs.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>> Is there a reason why this patch continues to be included in what is
>>> otherwise a clk driver patch series? Can this patch be sent separately
>>> from the clk patches (and not Cced to clk maintainers/list) in the
>>> future?
>> Sure thing. On reflection, this belongs with the misc support patches.
>>
> Even better, the "misc" series goes through my tree but this patch is
> unrelated. So if you send it on it's own it could just be picked up by
> the PDC maintainer (or Rob).
>
>
Sure thing. I'll just send each on their own.
Thanks,
Melody
Powered by blists - more mailing lists